Selective Cell Recruitment and Spatially Controlled Cell Attachment on Instructive Chitosan Surfaces Functionalized with Antibodies
© The Author(s) 2012
Received: 5 July 2012
Accepted: 9 October 2012
Published: 30 October 2012
Bioactive constructs to guide cellular mobilization and function have been proposed as an approach for a new generation of biomaterials in functional tissue engineering. Adult mesenchymal stem cells have been widely used as a source for cell based therapeutic strategies, namely tissue engineering. This is a heterogeneous cell population containing many subpopulations with distinct regenerative capacity. Thus, one of the issues for the effective clinical use of stem cells in tissue engineering is the isolation of a highly purified, expandable specific subpopulation of stem cells. Antibody functionalized biomaterials could be promising candidates to isolate and recruit specific cell types. Here we propose a new concept of instructive biomaterials that are able to recruit and purify specific cell types from a mixed cell population. This biomimetic concept uses a target-specific chitosan substrate to capture specific adipose derived stem cells. Specific antibodies were covalently immobilized onto chitosan membranes using bis[sulfosuccinimidyl] suberate (BS3). Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) was used to monitor antibody immobilization/adsorption onto the chitosan films. Specific antibodies covalently immobilized, kept their bioactivity and captured specific cell types from a mixed cell population. Microcontact printing allowed to covalently immobilize antibodies in patterns and simultaneously a spatial control in cell attachment.
Surface functionalization with extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules or synthetic cell adhesive peptides has been used to control cell performance on different surfaces [1, 2]. Published works report the coating or tailoring of biomaterials with bioactive molecules, such as fibronectin , laminin , growth factors [5, 6] or their integrin-binding epitopes including RGD [7, 8] and GFOGER . These studies report the influence of such biomolecules in cell adhesion, differentiation or proliferation. However, concerning specific and selective cell recruitment few studies are found in the literature.
The difficulty of growing specific cell types as a purified population and in large quantities is one of the major limitations in stem cell based therapies. Cell sorting according to their size has been proposed as an effective and rapid method to separate cells [10, 11]. Dielectrophoresis separates cells according to their electric properties and/or size . Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) is a method for cell separation based in the specific light scattering and fluorescent characteristics of each cell that requires prior labelling of cells with fluorescent markers and is often time-consuming. The use of microfluidic devices in adhesion-based separation of cells is also a promising method that as been reported in the literature [13, 14].
Currently the most efficient technique to separate cells it is to recognize its specific surface antigens. The most common method for cell sorting and enrichment is based on magnetic cell separation. Magnetic beads utilize a capturing surface or matrix coated with an antibody that has high affinity for a specific cell-surface marker binding target cells [15, 16]. To date, few studies reported the use of a biomaterial surfaces functionalized with antibodies for cell capture. Among them, most reported surfaces with antibodies to recruit endothelial cells improving hemocompatibility and endothelialization [17–19]. Kutryk and co-workers were the first presenting a strategy of a stent coated with an anti-human CD34 antibody for capturing endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) from the blood stream . Levy and co-workers recently presented a study were the immobilization of anti-human CD47 antibodies is effective in the reduction of acute and chronic inflammatory response to polymeric biomaterials .
Adipose tissue is a promising source of adult stem cells that can be harvested by a minimally invasive procedure and low morbidity. Though only a small amount of the heterogeneous cell population that is harvested from adipose tissue are stem cells . Moreover within stem cells there are many subpopulations with different capabilities to differentiate through different lineages and thus with distinct therapeutic potential . For further clinical research and commercial advances in this area, appropriate methods for stem cell isolation and purification are needed.
Chitosan is a linear copolymer of glucosamine and N-acetyl glucosamine obtained by N-deacetylation of chitin. It has been widely investigated for biomedical applications due to its remarkable properties, namely biocompatibility, biodegradability and nontoxicity [24, 25]. Herein we develop chitosan surfaces able to capture a specific cell types based in the concept of antibody coating for cell sorting. Our goal was to create new biomaterial surfaces capable of recruit a specific cell population within a mixture, reducing cell manipulation and time consuming. Chitosan membranes were functionalized with different antibodies and their ability for cell capture was accessed. To effectively immobilize the antibody we used BS3 homobifunctional (di-succinimide ester) cross-linking reagent that targets amine functional groups and forms stable amide linkages. By microcontact printing (μCP) of antibodies we were able to spatially control cell attachment. For the proof-of-concept we performed in vitro biological tests using human adipose stem cells (ASCs) and Osteoblast-like cells (SaOs-2).
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Chitosan Film Preparation
1 % (w/v) chitosan (Sigma-Aldrich) solution in 2 % (v/v) acetic acid was dropped over 1.3 cm2 glass coverslips (Agar Scientific). The solvent was evaporated over 48 h. Films were then treated with 0.1 M NaOH and extensively washed with distillated water until neutral pH. The samples were sterilized with ethylene oxide before use.
2.2 Surface Functionalization of Chitosan Membranes and Characterization
Anti-human CD3, anti-human CD29 and anti-human CD105 (eBioscience), were diluted in 0.35 mM BS3 (Sigma-Aldrich) at a 4 μg/ml concentration. Chitosan films were incubated with this solution overnight at room temperature. The modified films were then washed in PBS to remove non-attached antibody.
2.2.1 XPS Analysis
Analysis of the samples was performed using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha ESCA instrument equipped with aluminium Ka1, 2 monochromatized radiation at 1486.6 eV X-ray source. Due the non conductor nature of samples was necessary to use an electron flood gun to minimize surface charging. Neutralization of the surface charge was performed by using both a low energy flood gun (electrons in the range 0 to 14 eV) and a low energy Argon ions gun. The XPS measurements were carried out using monochromatic Al–K radiation (hν = 1486.6 eV). Photoelectrons were collected from a take off angle of 90º relative to the sample surface. The measurement was done in a Constant Analyser Energy mode (CAE) with a 100 eV pass energy for survey spectra and 20 eV pass energy for high resolution spectra. Charge referencing was done by setting the lower binding energy C1s photo peak at 285.0 eV C1s hydrocarbon peak. Surface elemental composition was determined using the standard Scofield photoemission cross sections.
2.2.2 Antibody Coupling Followed by QCM
Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) measurements were carried out on an E1 Microbalance (Q-Sense) at a temperature of 20 ± 0.1 °C. Silica crystals were spun coated with a chitosan solution 0.5 % (w/v) in acetic acid 2 % (v/v) at 4000 rpm during 2 min. Substrates were dried over 48 h and neutralized by immersion in a 0.1 M NaOH solution. The thickness of chitosan films in the dried state was measured using the P-16 + surface profiler (KLA Tencor, USA). For the QCM experiments a flow rate of 50 μL/min was used. The films were first washed with PBS buffer until equilibration, followed by a solution of anti-human CD29 antibody (10 μg/ml) in PBS in order to evaluate non-specific adsorption on the chitosan film. After washing with PBS, a solution of the linker BS3 (0.35 mM) was injected followed by a solution of the antibody (4 μg/ml) in BS3 (0.35 mM). The changes in the dissipation (ΔD) and frequency (ΔF) presented in this work correspond to values obtained from the fifth overtone (n = 5).
2.3 Cell Culture
The ability of functionalized membranes to capture specific cell types was tested using cell cultures of ASCs isolated from liposuction samples (Hospital da Prelada, Porto) and osteoblast like cells (SaOs-2) (European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECCC)).
ASCs were enzymatically isolated from subcutaneous adipose tissue as previously described . Briefly lipoaspirate samples were digested with 0.2 % collagenase type II (Sigma Aldrich) in PBS for 90 min at 37 °C in gentle stirring. The digested tissue was filtered using a 100 μm filter mesh (Sigma Aldrich) and centrifuged at 1,250 rpm for 10 min to remove the floating adipocytes. The cell pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer for 10 min to disrupt the erythrocytes. After a centrifugation at 800 rpm for 10 min, cells were resuspended in culture medium and placed in culture flasks.
Both cell types were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Sigma), supplemented with 10 % heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Biochrom AG) and 1 % antibiotic antimicotic (Gibco). Cells were incubated at 37 °C in 5 % CO2. ASCs were used until passage fourth. DMEM without FBS was used for cell capture experiments. After culturing the cells for different time points in the modified surfaces, samples were washed with PBS and imaged using fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Z1M). DAPI (Sigma) and anti-human CD105-FITC (AbD Serotec) fluorescent markers were used to identify nuclei and CD105 cell surface antigens, respectively. Briefly membranes were incubated with DAPI (1:1000 dilution, in 1 × PBS) for 5 min and washed with PBS. Samples were then incubated with anti-human CD105-FITC diluted in PBS (5 μl/ml) and washed with PBS.
2.4 Bioactivity and Capture Specificity of the Antibody-Chitosan Surface
SaOs-2 cell line is very well documented and characterized thus was used to test the suitability of the developed method. Bioactivity of the immobilized antibody and capture specificity of the antibody-chitosan surface were assessed by monitoring and comparing cell attachment in different antibody modified membranes. SaOs-2 (5 × 104 cells/cm2) were incubated on anti-human CD3 and anti-human CD29 antibody modified chitosan membranes. Polystyrene coverslips and non-modified chitosan membranes were used as controls.
2.5 Microcontact Printing (μCP) of Antibodies
2.5.1 PDMS Stamp Preparation
The master for stamp preparation was fabricated by photolithography using SU-8 photolack . The PDMS stamp was prepared by casting a 10:1 mixture of Sylgard 184 (Dow Corning) pre-polymer and cross-linker onto the master and curing at 90 °C for 3 h in a vacuum oven. After cooling, the PDMS was peeled off from the lithographic template and cut to suitable sizes. Stamps were sonicated in ethanol and distilled water for 10 min and dried before use.
2.5.2 Ink Preparation and Fabrication of Antibody Patterns by μCP
2.6 Cell Capture Selectivity
To determine the effect of the immobilized antibody in cell separation a co-culture of cells was seeded on CD105 modified chitosan films. SaOs-2 and ASCs cells were seeded in the modified substrates at a density of 1 × 105/cm2 cells (5 × 104 each type of cell). Polystyrene coverslips were used as a control.
2.6.1 Flow Cytometry
SaOs-2, ASCs and the mixture after cell separation by the modified membranes were analysed by flow cytometry for cell surface marker expression. Markers used were chosen based on the minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells, defined by the International Society for Cellular Therapy . To evaluate cell-surface marker expression, cell suspensions were incubated at room temperature for 15 min with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)- or phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated monoclonal antibodies specific for human markers associated with mesenchymal lineages. Samples were analysed on a FACSCalibur cytometer and the resulting data were processed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Functionalization of Chitosan Membranes with Antibodies
Relative peak composition of C1s high resolution spectra
Chitosan + BS3 (%)
Chitosan + BS3 + antibody (%)
3.2 Bioactivity and Capture Specificity of the Antibody-Chitosan Conjugate
To test the bioactivity of the immobilized antibodies, modified membranes were seeded with SaOs-2 cells, a very well characterized cell type. CD29 was used to recruit and attach SaOs-2 and CD3 as a negative control. CD29 antigen is a subunit that makes up an integrin heterodimer and that is present in the surface of many cells including Saos-2. It is expected that anti-human CD29 antibody mediates SaOs-2 attachment to the chitosan films. CD3 was used as a negative control since it is not expressed by SaOs-2 cells and in principle it does not have any influence in cell attachment.
3.3 Microcontact Printing of Antibodies and Cell Patterning
Micropatterning of cells is a critical step for studies in the fundamental biology of cell–cell and cell-surface interactions and provides new tools for spatially controlled tissue engineering. The flexibility of sizes and shapes of the patterns have allowed generation of patterned cell co-cultures and more control in cell proliferation and differentiation. The culturing of patterned cells requires in most cases non-adhesive surfaces for further modification for cell attachment in specific regions [30, 31].
In the current work chitosan represents an attractive cell repellent surface. The results inhere presented shown that cells only attach when they recognize an antibody on the membrane. Antibody immobilization on chitosan membranes could then be used as support to design cell patterns and spatially control cell attachment.
μCP was used for spatial control over antibody attachment and thus spatially control in cell attachment on the membrane. A PDMS stamp with 10 μm diameter cylindrical pillars with 10 μm spacing was used to create “spots” of anti-human CD29.
SaOs-2 cells were seeded onto the substrate patterned with antibodies and incubated at 37 °C.
3.4 Cell Capture Selectivity
Following characterization and bioactivity tests, antibody modified membranes were used for cell capture selectivity experiments. In particular, the selection of ASCs from a co-culture of SaOs-2 and ASCs was attempted.
ASCs have been described as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). According to the International Society for Cellular Therapy guidelines, the criteria that define MSCs are adherence to plastic, multipotent differentiation potential and specific surface antigen expression (CD73, CD90, CD105) . From the referred it is known that CD105 is not expressed by SaOs-2 and highly expressed by ASCs.
Anti-human CD105 antibody was immobilized onto the chitosan films for capturing ASCs. After 4 h and 24 h incubation, samples were washed, stained and imaged to evaluate attached cells. Cells were labeled with DAPI to stain the nucleus and CD105-FITC to label the cells expressing CD105 antigen.
Flow cytometry was additionally performed to reinforce these results. SaOs-2, ASCs and the mixture of cells after cultured on modified membranes and TCPS were analysed by flow cytometry.
Corroborating results from immunostaining positive selection of CD105+ cells was successfully performed using the developed membranes coupled with CD105 antibody (Fig. 7c). From the recovered cells about 100 % of the cell population is positive for the marker. This result confirms the suitability of the presented system for selection of CD105+ cells. In addition, the isolation procedure did not affect cell proliferation (Fig. 6e). Thus, the system is capable of effectively isolating viable cells for subsequent cultivation and further applications.
The most common and effective method currently reported for isolation of a specific cell type involves the use of magnetic beads coated with antibodies for target cells. This technique requires the attachment of magnetic beads to the cells that may be undesirable for cell-based therapeutic applications [15, 16].
Microfluidic devices incorporating antibodies or micropillars in the microchannel are able to overcome the limitations of classical immunomagnetic separation technology [13, 14]. Still they have limitations in the sense that the cells selected in the system need to be later released and collected from the device to be used in many therapeutic strategies. Biomaterials functionalized with specific molecules that promote adhesion and cell separation in situ as the system reported in this work could be promising candidates for biomedical applications that require specific cell populations. Recently Khademhosseini and collaborators reported a similar study, where hyaluronic acid and heparin-based hydrogels functionalized with CD34 antibodies were used to promote adhesion and spreading of EPCs . The present report adds further evidence on the use of this type of system for cell separation from a mixed cell population.
Compared with currently available devices found in literature the system herein proposed besides effective it is relatively low cost using a biomaterial with easy chemistry that can be later implantable [10–16]. The method proposed in this work allows the isolation of a target cell type from a mixed cell population with relatively high purity, decreasing cell handling where recruited cells can be used straightaway.
Chitosan films were successfully grafted with antibodies using the BS3 linker. The immobilized antibodies remained functional and mediated selective cell attachment to the chitosan. Using μCP to create antibody patterns, cell attachment was spatially controlled. An attempt has been made with the present work to overcome the complex process of cell isolation and selection by using implantable biomaterials that are able to recruit and select cells to attach. A major challenge in the techniques currently available for cell separation is the lack of methods to achieve nondestructive release of cells. The use of antibody coated chitosan surfaces seems a promising approach to rapidly capture and seed a specific cell type directly to biomaterials, from a heterogeneous cell population avoiding additional cell manipulation.
Additional studies will be performed aiming to select specific cell types in designed patterns for cell co-cultures. The developed system could be in principle applied in 3D structures to be used in tissue engineering strategies. Also, the concept could be easily adapted to other substrates, either than chitosan. Further studies could be envisaged to assess the use of different immobilized bioactive cues to recruit circulating stem cells in vivo.
The authors acknowledge the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for the fellowships SFRH/BD/61390/2009 (C.A.C) and SFRH/BPD/45206/2008 (A.M.F), and also to the International Max-Planck-Research School (C.A.C) for the financial support. We are grateful to Hospital da Prelada for the lipoaspirates donations. This work was carried out under the scope of the EU 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. NMP4-SL-2009-229292 (Find&Bind).
- Shin H, Jo S, Mikos AG (2003) Biomaterials 24(24):4353–4364View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von der Mark K, Park J, Bauer S, Schmuki P (2010) Cell Tissue Res 339(1):131–153View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Custodio CA, Alves CM, Reis RL, Mano JF (2010) J Tissue Eng Regen Med 4(4):316–323View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hiraoka M, Kato K, Nakaji-Hirabayashi T, Iwata H (2009) Bioconjug Chem 20(5):976–983View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharon JL, Puleo DA (2008) Acta Biomater 4(4):1016–1023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pohl TL, Boergermann JH, Schwaerzer GK, Knaus P, Cavalcanti-Adam EA (2011) Acta Biomaterialia 8(2):772–780Google Scholar
- Sawyer AA, Hennessy KM, Bellis SL (2005) Biomaterials 26(13):1467–1475View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wirkner M, Weis S, San Miguel V, Alvarez M, Gropeanu RA, Salierno M, Sartoris A, Unger RE, Kirkpatrick CJ, del Campo A (2011) ChemBioChem 12(17):2623–2629View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wojtowicz AM, Shekaran A, Oest ME, Dupont KM, Templeman KL, Hutmacher DW, Guldberg RE, Garcia AJ (2010) Biomaterials 31(9):2574–2582View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zheng SY, Liu JQ, Tai YC (2008) J Microelectromech Syst 17(4):1029–1038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schirhagl R, Fuereder I, Hall EW, Medeiros BC, Zare RN (2011) Lab Chip 11(18):3130–3135View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stephens M, Talary MS, Pethig R, Burnett AK, Mills KI (1996) Bone Marrow Transpl 18(4):777–782Google Scholar
- Hatch A, Hansmann G, Murthy SK (2011) Langmuir 27(7):4257–4264View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sheng WA, Chen T, Katnath R, Xiong XL, Tan WH, Fan ZH (2012) Anal Chem 84(9):4199–4206View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balmayor ER, Pashkuleva I, Frias AM, Azevedo HS, Reis RL (2011) J R Soc Interface 8(59):896–908View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rada T, Gomes ME, Reis RL (2011) J Tissue Eng Regen Med 5(8):655–664View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ye XF, Zhao Q, Sun XN, Li HQ (2009) Tissue Eng Pt A 15(1):1–11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Camci-Unal G, Nichol JW, Bae H, Tekin H, Bischoff J, Khademhosseini A (2012) J Tissue Eng Regen Med. doi:10.1002/term.517
- Lin QK, Ding X, Qiu FY, Song XX, Fu GS, Ji J (2010) Biomaterials 31(14):4017–4025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aoki J, Serruys PW, van Beusekom H, Ong ATL, McFadden EP, Sianos G, van der Giessen WJ, Regar E, de Feyter PJ, Davis HR, Rowland S, Kutryk MJB (2005) J Am Coll Cardiol 45(10):1574–1579View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stachelek SJ, Finley MJ, Alferiev IS, Wang FX, Tsai RK, Eckells EC, Tomczyk N, Connolly JM, Discher DE, Eckmann DM, Levy RJ (2011) Biomaterials 32(19):4317–4326View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tholpady SS, Llull R, Ogle RC, Rubin JP, Futrell JW, Katz AJ (2006) Clin Plastic Surg 33(1):55View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rada T, Reis RL, Gomes ME (2011) Stem Cell Rev Rep 7(1):64–76View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alves NM, Mano JF (2008) Int J Biol Macromol 43(5):401–414View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E (2011) Prog Polym Sci 36(8):981–1014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rada T, Reis RL, Gomes AE (2009) J Tissue Eng Regen M 3(2):158–159View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Greiner C, del Campo A, Arzt E (2007) Langmuir 23(7):3495–3502View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, Krause DS, Deans RJ, Keating A, Prockop DJ, Horwitz EM (2006) Cytotherapy 8(4):315–317View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Briggs D (1998) Surface analysis of polymers by Xps and static sims. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE (1998) Biotechnol Progr 14(3):356–363View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Torisawa YS, Mosadegh B, Cavnar SP, Ho M, Takayama S (2011) Tissue Eng Part C 17(1):61–67View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.